I have mild ulcerative colitis which I hardly even notice, but I need to keep it in check so it does not progress and increase my chances of colon cancer. Those with colitis are six times more likely to develop colon cancer. Before starting this curated paper I reviewed the cancer dysbiosis article which suddenly has new meaning for me as I’ve been researching my own disease in the last couple of days. The effects of the microbiome on cancer development are hardly surprising at this point. While researching colitis I was shocked to read a study that compared the benefit of an anti-inflammatory drug (mesalamine) that I am currently taking with the benefit of a particular bacterial strain, Escherichia coli Nissle, taken as an oral probiotic. The bacteria was just as helpful as mesalamine in inducing and maintaining remission from symptoms. This blows my mind. Why am I not taking this probiotic instead? I also found a study done at Stanford that revealed a link between ulcerative colitis patients and the absence of a specific bacteria, Ruminococcaceae, that is primarily responsible for producing secondary bile acids from primary bile acids. Low levels of secondary bile acids are characteristic of ulcerative colitis and the related Crohn’s disease. Inflammatory bowel disease has no known cause and no cure, yet it seems very apparent that microbiome imbalance is a culprit and regaining that balance seems a likely cure. I am eager to learn more.
In Animal Behavior we watched a documentary called “The Mind’s Eye” about the way the brain processes visual information. It highlighted several individuals that each suffered a specific and symmetrical brain injury that damaged the visual system of the brain in a way that teaches us about the function of that area. One person could not recognize objects that he saw. If he felt an object he could tell what it was and he could pull up detailed images of objects in his head but seeing objects triggered no meaning for him. Another individual could recognize objects just fine but was face blind and could not recognize even his own face if a photo was shown to him. Another woman could not see objects once they started moving. She would see them in a sort of strobe effect but could not perceive the actual motion. The takeaway from these case studies was that there seems to be so much visual information coming in from our eyes that the brain cannot process it all at once in the same part of the brain. Several different parts of the brain work together with specific specializations to help us quickly make sense of visual information.
I watched a video about suicide prevention for a class several years ago and a line from that stood out to me. A man that had survived a suicide attempt and then dedicated his life to help prevent suicide said that “the brain is an organ and it can be diseased just like any other organ.” It sounds obvious but that changed the way I see mental illness. Brain disorders are so confusing because it seems like we should be able to control it. We are usd to being able to control our thoughts and feelings for the most part. And losing that ability is scary.
It’s surprising to hear that we don’t know the purpose of the normal Huntingtin protein. I wonder what studies have been done that involve removing the gene for its expression. If it is unneeded, why not genetically modify the gametes of individuals with Huntington’s before fertilization occurs so their children won’t inherit the faulty gene and we could eliminate the disease. Some research involves gene editing in an adult diagnosed with the disease, but I’m more interested in modifying eggs or sperm to remove defective genes before they are passed on.“https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/08/22/746321083/scientists-attempt-controversial-experiment-to-edit-dna-in-human-sperm-using-cri” This article introduces research going on about trying to get CRISPR into sperm cells. I guess this is difficult because the DNA is fully condensed in the sperm before fertilization. It’s also very controversial research because if successful, this power will be difficult to manage and will open the doors to designer babies. In my opinion, it would be so worth it. So many genetic diseases could be eradicated. Unethical people will behave unethically. We should do all we can to control the power, but we shouldn’t leave curable debilitating diseases uncured out of fear of people also using that power to be stupid. Just criminalize the stupid behavior and don’t make it legal to make designer babies out of preference. We already criminalize certain kinds of human embryo testing, we should just implement the same policies we have for that.
It’s overwhelming to read about the potential effects of traumatic brain injuries. I fell off a longboard a couple of years ago and hit my head pretty hard. I remember trying to stop to avoid hitting a little girl that walked out in front of me and then I remember laying face up in the grass. I have no memory of the fall or landing. I don’t know if I was unconscious for two seconds or ten. Since then I’ve sure had lots of dramatic life events. I wonder if my head injury affected the way I responded. Have I been more emotional? Have I been more anxious? Or are these things totally unrelated and coincidental? I don’t envy anyone in the field of psychology trying to determine the statistical significance of studies like this because it’s so hard to quantitatively measure moods and essentially impossible to control for all the variables involved. My brother suffered a concussion while wakeboarding and he never seemed to be the same afterward, but he also was dating someone and got married right at the same time. Marriage sure brings out a lot and changes a person. Is it possible to know if he would have changed in the same way without the head injury?
I am so fascinated by habits. “The Power of Habit” was one of the most impactful books I’ve ever read. Instead of making new year’s resolutions, I have a little notebook with a long list of habits I hope to form or break. I review that list regularly. It is very exciting to notice myself habitually doing something on that list knowing how difficult that specific thing used to be for me at some point. Once it’s a habit, you don’t have to try, you don’t have to think, you just reap the rewards. So powerful. The neural pruning “Use it or Lose it” principle that was mentioned in context of drug abuse is a bittersweet concept. On one hand I am grateful for many of my childhood activities like extensive reading that clearly benefit me today and on the other hand I can see other ways that my time was spent as a child that has made my life much harder than it needs to be. I like to hope that even though my brain has been “mature” for a couple of years now as I am about to turn 27 years old, I still have the capability to change my brain for the better - rerouting bad habits and creating new good ones.
I loved the natural products article, especially the way it described herbal medicine starting to be regarded as old wives tales or superstition as compared to chemically synthesized medicines. We need to give credit to and put more research into plant and fungal chemicals and their medicinal properties. I mention fungus even though the article did not because fungi are fantastic chemists and they seem to be underrated. Plants have been studied and experimented with by humans for thousands of years but it’s only been recently that we’ve understood the nature of fungi and the way that their fruiting bodies are a very small part of their true form. I’ve learned from organic chemistry and microbiology that fungi can produce some extremely complex molecules and I’m sure there are many that have useful properties that we are not yet aware of. I’m really getting excited about this. The reverse pharmacology concept was interesting, if I understand correctly, with reverse pharmacology, the herbs are all on the market already based on traditional knowledge. While available on the market scientists can study the herb and figure out the active moiety and perhaps improve efficacy. This is opposed to finding a lead, researching and testing it before it is available to anyone. There are pros and cons to each but reverse pharmacology seems to have great value.