Connecting the Dots
Over the past three weeks we’ve been studying the relationships between the body, mind, and spirit, and how disease can disrupt that balance. At first I was a little skeptical of the whole idea of Aryuveda and thought it to be initially quite. However, I found that by studying more about it, as well as it’s practical application with diabetes as a case study, that it turns out to be a really great tool of characterizing disease as a disruptor of harmony between body systems.
Over the past three weeks we’ve been studying the relationships between the body, mind, and spirit, and how disease can disrupt that balance. At first I was a little skeptical of the whole idea of Aryuveda and thought it to be initially quite. However, I found that by studying more about it, as well as it’s practical application with diabetes as a case study, that it turns out to be a really great tool of characterizing disease as a disruptor of harmony between body systems.
Here, in entries from the first
week, I explored the concept of Aryuveda and it’s usefulness as a broad idea to
describe physical, emotional, and mental balance. Hence, tenses may change and
fluctuate from past to present due to it being written as a journal entry. I
decided to leave it this way so as to let the audience observe my progression
in understanding the idea a little better.
“To go along with the semester theme
of Aryuveda, we had a discussion in class today regarding the
interconnectedness and balance present between the body, mind, and spirit. The
question was posed as to what composed the spirit of a person and how that was
related to the mind. I must say that this question has often puzzled me and
given me a lot to think about even prior to todays discussion. It was proposed
that the mind is the chemical and physical processes that effect how are body
works and that the spirit is more the defined by our feelings. However, this
doesn't seem to be a perfect answer because we know that so many of our
emotions are stimulated and propagated by chemical signaling through various
structures of the brain. The limbic system for example is where most of our
emotional responses have been isolated to according to studies using pET
scanning techniques. So emotion can't be what separates the mind from the
spirit according to the proposed definition. I couldn't articulate a good
answer at this moment other than maybe the spirit is something that is not
understood at the moment and for that reason, no distinction can be made
between the two because one is very poorly understood. Most likely because we
do not have the scientific means to prove its existence. “
However, as I
mulled the idea over in my mind I began to think of it’s usefulness as a
vehicle for exploration in discovering new knowledge leading to my following
entry.
“The idea that the body and the mind
are connected has gotten me thinking about the experiments that could be set up
or observed to test the hypothesis. I'm
excited to do more research into it this semester. I'm excited to link concepts
in scientific knowledge regarding body systems, with their correlating systems
in the mind. My group wants to study particularly the effects that sleep has on
the psychological function of the brain, as well as the physical repercussions
of either sufficient or insufficient sleep. Maybe even too much sleep is bad
for you?”
But I needed more information. My
understanding of Aryuveda was still a little cloudy and I was struggling to fit
it into my mindset of rigorous science being used to prove things as either
true or false. This took me down my next rabbit hole;
“Upon researching specific articles
and information regarding the practice of Aryuveda I came across a fact that
stated that the practice is about 5,000 years old. What impacted me the most
from the article was the fact that humans have always been drawn to a
systematic way of determining best health practices. That our desire for good
health pushes us towards scientific analysis of what does and does not work. I
am particularly fond of the for just that reason. The simple existence of
Aryuveda, which means "life science/knowledge", is a testament to the
human drive to "feel" the best that we possibly can, and to approach
the problem in a systematic fashion. Although many things in Aryuveda do not
align with modern scientific theory, the discovery of Aryuvedic prevention
medicine appears to have been a process of trial and error, while carefully
noting down the things that do and do not work. It is if anything, a
demonstration of how the mind desires to be in balance with the body, pushing
itself to logically reason through and retain the different processes necessary
to maintain that balance.”
In order to expand on that idea, I
read an article regarding how Aryuveda does not focus so much on confronting
disease as it does in preventing the appearance of disease. Aryuvedic theory
proposes that disease is the manifestation of an imbalance between the body,
mind, and spirit. Thus, to prevent disease, the objective must be to keep those
three things in balance. One big idea in the paper that I read was that stress,
both physical and emotional, is at the root of many diseases. While we know
that some forms of stress are healthy and can produce growth, it is also
documented as to how stress decreases our body's ability to fight disease. I
particularly liked their comparison of stress to that of the roots of a tree.
We do not acknowledge the tree fully until we see it's strong trunk, branches
and leaves. And though we might try to prune at the tree, it will not die until
the roots are removed from the ground. Stress and other undercurrents in our
lives act as the roots of a tree feeding the branches and leaves which are the
manifested symptoms of the disease. I thought that this was a particularly good
analogy because it points out how often we use our scientific knowledge to
address components, but not the whole reason behind a disease.
Now that I had a
better understanding of Aryuveda it was nice to then come to class and have
discussions, as well as think of my own life experiences, seeing how diabetes
offsets that balance between the mind and body. Discussions ranged from ethics
and philosophy, to real world examples and economic consequences of the
imbalance. Here are a few entries showing my thoughts.
“Today we had a lively discussion in
class regarding the economic burden of diabetes and obesity and what role
government plays in mitigating the impacts of these diseases. One of the major
discussions focused on whether or not the government had the right to direct
the food choices of people receiving food through programs like SNAP. Two
arguments were posed that I felt were equally valid, only adding to the
complexity of the problem. The first posed that if someone who is on food
stamps is already using the governments aid, then their eating habits should be
directed in a way as to prevent any further burden to the healthcare system by
preventing or mitigating diseases such as obesity and diabetes. The other
argument to counter was that the restriction of agency in food choices could
lead to discouragement in this demographic, leading to overall poorer quality
of life and maybe indirectly, poorer health. I honestly don't know which camp I
am in because it is a decision that involves many complexities that I obviously
have yet to account for, but I am interested in studying further.”
Upon reflecting about the sheer
prevalence of diabetes as a disease as well as the demographics that it most
generally afflicts, I kept thinking about my experience at the Doctor's
Volunteer Clinic in St. George. The DVC is a free clinic where patients who do
not health insurance can come to be cared for by volunteer physicians and nurse
practitioners. My job while I was there was to scribe for physicians as well as
interpret interactions in Spanish. The single-most common appointment that
people came in for was either a diabetes check-up, or a "let's get my
diabetes under control" meeting. Mostly the latter. Upon reading this
literature it makes perfect sense regarding the low-income populations
mentioned and how they are most heavily afflicted by complications with
diabetes. Without regular check-ups, it is ridiculously easy to let it get out
of control, and for complications to then arise. The worst thing I saw was a
disabled young man who had been having chronic diarrhea for weeks due to his
family members failing to control his diabetes.
As I read more and more articles I
found that more and more questions arose. Particularly about the economic
burdens resulting from diabetes. Not just the visible, emotional problems that
I had seen in clinic. Here are some thoughts;
“Today while reading the economic article I was particularly
concerned by the statistics regarding the population over the age of 65.
Particularly because of the fact that 61 percent of healthcare costs for this
age group are solely due to patients with diabetes. It could then be inferred
that Medicare covers most everyone over the age of 65 and thus raises the
question, does diabetes and related illnesses account for 61 percent of
Medicare costs?”
As I thought
about our plight my mind was drawn to examples of this burden placed on society through the insurance model. I have most readily been exposed to it in the
emergency medicine system and it is quite apparent, if not blatant.
A few months ago I was working my
job on the ambulance, working as an EMT. One of the most common calls that we
get are diabetic emergencies, usually due to hypoglycemia and occasionally
hyperglycemia. In this case the patient was hypoglycemic and was quickly
brought back to consciousness with some intravenous glucose. However, what
struck me about this patient, in light of this article articulating the amount
of prescriptions written for diabetic patients, was the sheer volume of
medications listed in their medical record. Upon reflection, I've realized that
that same pattern is seen in almost every diabetic patient that I've helped
while working on the ambulance. The pattern is undeniable and shows that
diabetes as a disease is not contained to just itself but brings on a whole
myriad of complications, each requiring it's specifically tailored
pharmaceutical.
Overall, the big take home message
for me from the past weeks of study is that the body must retain a delicate
balance. Diabetes and the mechanisms of insulin dependence and insulin
resistance are perfect examples of how when this balance is disrupted, both the
mind and body are afflicted. A person’s emotions as well are subject to severe
damage just because of all of the inevitable medical complications. I eagerly
look forward to observing more examples of this balance and further practice in
articulating the great need to maintain it.