Social and Historical Impacts of Scientific Discoveries
It
is inevitable that as truth surfaces from science’s efforts, it will change our
approach to a multitude of problems. Not just those directly related to
science. These problems can range from politics to sociology. These past weeks
while learning about the microbiome, brain, and genome editing, the impact that
science has on the balance of human social and economic constructs is obvious.
Throughout
my reading there were many examples of how recent scientific discoveries have
shaped societal views as well as the economic market of the world. However,
science’s reach is not just confined to economic and social constructs. It
extends to fields such as politics, ethics, and of course, history. From a
reductionist’s viewpoint, the shape of history since the Renaissance is framed
by the scientific discoveries that molded the thought of world leaders since.
The scientific discoveries regarding the microbiome and neurological
development, brain disease, and genome editing technology have not only
enhanced the pursuit of science. These discoveries have already and will go on
to shape the humanities, economics, and art more than any scientist could have
initially predicted.
The
study of the microbiome has resulted in information that may effect what is
socially acceptable in the realm of child rearing. For example it has been
shown that a mouse’s microbiome has a significant impact on post-natal
neurological development. One of the most impactful findings from this
study is the correlation between the early stage of post-natal development and
susceptibility to the effects of a microbiome. This is important because it has
implications for how we may raise our children. It may be inferred that a baby
who is brought home to a sterile environment may be at a disadvantage in
neurological development. Obviously, more research needs to be done in order to
gain more evidence for this notion, but the evidence shown is compelling. How
could this knowledge impact society’s views of
“correct” child rearing? In the past mothers have been taught that
utmost cleanliness must be observed when a newborn arrives home. But as more information and research into
this topic develops, it could have a significant impact on the social construct
of proper mothering.
While
knowledge of the microbiome may effect what happens in the home, studies and
findings regarding the brain have had a large impact on what happens on the
football field. With the discovery of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE)
and it’s link to head trauma sustained in contact sports, the NFL has added
over 47 new rules to protect players. For example, players are now penalized
for any head to head hits. CTE is a degenerative brain disease that can develop
due to repeated trauma to the head. The threat that it poses to players has
prompted sports leagues at all levels to implement rules to prevent the
development of disease. However, the effects of the discovery of CTE were not
limited to just policy changes. The NFL initially battled the findings
bitterly, knowing what impact it could have on their economic gains and
potential loss of investors and viewers. However, luckily the story of the
discovery is one of the triumph of scientific truth over powerful economic
players, with the NFL ultimately taking a hit economically as public opinion
mounted behind the findings.
The
discovery of CTE profoundly influenced both the policy making and economics of
pro and college football. But football is an isolated sector of society and
economy. What would be the impacts of a technology that could impact
generations upon generations of humans and healthcare economics? With the
discovery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system the potential for germ-line genome editing
(GGE) is now a serious possibility in our future. GGE would be used to change
the actual germline of a developing fetus and thus, the changes induced by
CRISPR would propagate for generations, not simply ending with the individual who
underwent GGE. This raises a whole new field of genetic ethics and has enormous
implications for the history of mankind. Is GGE ethical if the generations to
follow have no choice in the decision? Could it potentially homogenize the
human genome and make us vulnerable to future diseases? These are questions
that must be taken into consideration, for they may determine the fate of
humans on earth.
Even
more pressing on my mind with the discovery of CRISPR, is the potential impact
it could have on our history. The eugenics movement of the early 1900’s had a
significant impact on Hitler’s ideology and justification for genetic
“cleansing”. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., a Supreme Court
justice stated in 1927, “three generations of imbeciles is enough.” He was referring
to the idea that it was legally acceptable to sterilize the mentally deficient
or criminally insane, for the overall benefit of the human gene pool. This idea
was a manifestation of the overall movement of eugenics. I must admit, the
possibility of CRISPR technology being used as a vehicle for moving the
eugenics movement forward does make me shiver. Jennifer Doudna herself, the
scientist responsible for discovering the CRISPR/Cas9 system, stated in an
interview that she feared that her discovery could give more momentum and power
to radical ideas stemming from eugenics. CRISPR could significantly empower
this idea with how quickly and completely it can edit the human genome. Doudna
said her greatest fear was that she had just given “Hitler the tool he had
always dreamt of.” The potential impacts of this scientific discovery on world
history are numerous and frankly unknown. Only time will tell how it will affect
the balance currently present.
These examples of the microbiome, CTE, and the CRISPER/Cas9
system show that the societal ramifications of scientific discoveries are much
broader and unpredictable than what could be initially ideated. Hopefully, we
can be wise as a society in how we handle the truth that science is constantly
bringing to the table.