Curated Paper 2
In high school, I got to take a
course that is an introductory course to the medical field and all the
different careers and specialties within it. One of my good friends in the
class has a father who is a pathologist. Because of this, he was selected to
give a presentation on pathology. He collected dozens of photographs from his
dad showing different diseases and diagnosis. I was incredibly fascinated by
how small changes that can only be seen under the microscope could cause
serious complications and unfortunately for some, death.
Growing up there would be random
times when the term monocultures would turn up. While I was a teenager, I
watched a video about why do bananas taste so different from their candy
favoring counterparts. This is because the bananas that we grow today are a
completely different strain from the ones that were being grown in the early
1900s. The bananas back then were the Gros Michel variety, and they had a taste
similar to that we find in candy like laffy taffy. They were grown in huge
monoculture planation bananas around the world for years. This was until the
1950s when a fungus that causes Panama Disease infected the plantations. This
killed all the harvest and essentially made the Gros Michel banana commercially
extinct. This caused the banana industry to switch to the now used Cavendish
banana which is immune to the Panama Disease causing fungus. There are still
concerns from scientists today about the next disease-causing extinction of
another species of bananas, because we continue to produce them on large
monoculture plantations.
In my Microbiology class, we talked
extensively about different plant fungi and how they cause diseases. We talked
about plant rust which causes growth retardation and causes unsightly brown and
red dots to appear on the leaves. This decreases the marketability and amount
that farmers can sell their products. However, there are some fungi that we use
and benefits the farmers. There is a type of fungus that grows on corn and in
Mexico instead of destroying it and burning fields like they may in the United
States the farmers eat it. In Mexico, this is called huitlacoche and it is a
delicacy that is eaten in tacos and other dishes. A nonedible example is that
there is a fungus that causes hypertrophy in plants and especially trees. This
causes a large burl to form on the tree, and many woodworkers love this wood due
to the intricate grain patterns. This means that objects crafted from burl wood
can fetch significantly higher prices than a similar object made from ordinary
grain wood.
During my Evolution course, we spoke
on different adaptation strategies that are used by various viruses. If a virus
is evolving in an area of low population density, it will evolve to have a high
transmission rate and a low mortality rate. We see the inverse effect when it
evolves in a high population density area where there is a relatively lower
transmission but a much higher level of mortality. There are so many things
that pathogens have to consider when they infect a host. Some will be in the
host for years before there are symptoms of infection. The pathogen will wait
in an “inactive” form until the conditions are just right to multiply and
infect other hosts.
As a kid, I would play the game
Plague inc. so much during my free time. The premise of the game was to develop
a disease to a level high enough to infect all humans and eventually kill
everyone. To do this you have to create new strains that are increasingly more contagious
while also increasing resistance to drugs, heat, and the cold. One of the most
important elements to winning was providing different ways of transmission. You
can create a pathogen that is spread by water, air, blood, rats, livestock,
birds, and many more. Each one of these had its perks but also downsides to it.
The main strategy that I would use was to create a highly infectious disease,
but it would not kill anyone, because once it becomes fatal the scientists
would start working on a cure. You would wait until late in the game when
everyone is infected and then you would increase the lethality so that everyone
would eventually die from the disease before a cure.
Gene therapy, I believe, is the next
great element of the pharmaceutical industry. We can either through gene
editing provide ways to eliminate different diseases such as HIV or AIDS. We
could also provide specific medications and methods that are suited best for
our genes. With this we could treat infections and diseases far more
effectively. However, there are major ethical situations that become prevalent
to the argument for or against gene editing. In Pre-AP biology in high school,
my class watched the 1997 film Gattaca. This movie is set in the
dystopian future where scientists through gene editing have created the “perfect”
human. They talk about how the best athletes are geniuses and lack ailments
that are also found in the unedited humans. Unfortunately, this means that humans
conceived the traditional way are considered inferior and are not given the
same treatment. Gene editing while beneficial to eliminating diseases and
pathogens can create increased discrimination against those who are unable to
afford the treatment.
Many
times, our body doesn’t need extensive treatment. We have an immune system that
is easily capable of preventing and stopping different pathogens. This is where
ayurveda comes back into play. We can return our bodies to a balance and then
have it fight the imbalance that is brought on by these pathogens. While
shadowing a physician, he showed me some of the awards that he received over
the years. Two of the awards he was most proud of were “Highest Patient Satisfaction”
and “Lowest Amount of Medication Prescribed.” What made these awards increasingly
impressive was the fact that he won both in the same year. Many physicians will
only listen to a patient for a couple of minutes before prescribing a medication
and moving on to the next appointment. The physician that I shadowed would listen
to the patient and their needs before coming to a decision on any prescribed
medications that they may need. He found that many did not need extensive doses
but only need to make minor changes to their lifestyle.
In
recent years, concern about over prescription of antibiotics has become
increasingly more mainstream. Many pathogens have become drug resistant to simple
antibiotics like penicillin. This in turn makes the drug ineffective to kill
the bacteria and can return medicine to a dark age of being unable to treat these
diseases. We have come up with drugs of last resort such as Vancomycin which
are used in dire circumstances where the disease is resistant to all previous
treatments.
Pathogens
are going to be a regular part of our daily lives forever. We need to learn how
to avoid their devastating effects by limiting the use of monocultures. We also
need to change our method of prescribing medications and increasing our use of
ayurveda in medicine. Finally we need to increase research into gene editing
and its ethical applications to increase our resistance to different pathogens
and diseases.
Your writing really shows your diverse knowledge and curiosity for pathogens and medicine! You tied in your own personal experiences with other classes perfectly! I also touched on gene editing in my paper, very interesting stuff!
ReplyDeleteI love how you made lots of connections between the material you've learned, your own personal experiences, and the new research you did to discover more information. It makes your writing cohesive and very enjoyable to read. I thought is was unique that you included a comparison between fungal infections that take away from vs add value to plant products, super interesting perspective! I was also fascinated by the fungal diseases discussed in microbiology, and I included it in my journaling from the perspective of parasitic infection.
ReplyDelete