Kyle Javenes
BIOL-4500
History
of Diabetes and Where to go Next
The
history of disease is often overlooked by many individuals. Looking at where we
have built off of can be quite inspirational, especially when looking at more
recent history. It can tell us how diseases can evolve biologically, but also
how they change our culture. For example, we used to refer to sailors as “limeys”.
This cultural norm was caused by the finding of scurvy being prevented by
citrus fruits and sailors were the population most at risk. When they started
consuming more of these fruits the name came with it. More relevant though would be the change in
naming for diabetes. We used to say type 2 diabetes was adult onset diabetes,
but now we see children with the same etiology. This dismisses the prior naming
and we settle on calling it type 2. Disease can leave a huge impact on the
world we live, whether historically, presently, and or in our futures.
The
first recorded mention of what we know to be diabetes is over 3500 years ago in
Egypt by Hesy-ra (McCoy, 2009) . He described the
urine as sweet, but aside from that nothing about treatment was mentioned. This
isn’t meant to say no one was trying to understand the disease, but the options
weren’t great. In 150 AD a Greek physician by the name of Arateus said that diabetes
is “the melting down of flesh and limbs into urine” (McCoy, 2009) .
This was a fairly accurate description of what happened to people until 1921
when the first insulin treatment was done by Banting and colleagues (ADA, 2014). There is still a lot that
happened though prior to this huge success, but in comparison they are small
changes. In 1675 it was no longer referred to as diabetes, but diabetes mellitus
(which translates to “siphon honey”) ( (McCoy, 2009) . What would have
driven this change? Likely “water tasters” had something to do with this
because they were often sampling the urine for their work. In 1776 Matthew
Dobson measured for glucose contents in the urine and found higher levels in
diabetics (Polonsky, 2012) . This identified
what created that sweet taste in the urine. Knowing what was in the urine set
up for some chemical testing and in the early 1800s just this happened putting
water tasters out of business to some extent.
By
1812 the New England Journal of Medicine and Surgery established diabetes as a
disease (Polonsky, 2012) . The world doesn’t
quite revolve around this journal though as treatments were already being given
out prior to that by clinicians who recognized it as a disease. In the 1700s
diabetes patients started to receive recommendations on changing diet and
exercise (McCoy, 2009) . This has had some
lasting impacts in how we treat diabetics today even. The primary
recommendation was to not consume sugary foods and shift the diet over to
largely fats and proteins. There was another recommendation though which was to
overload on carbs. Treatments were
starting to be developed more and more at this point. In 1889 someone thought
to remove a dog’s pancreas and see how they died (McCoy, 2009) . This is eerily
similar to the concept of gene knockouts, but a bit bigger. Well they found out
that it was by diabetes. We would not be able to have done this in today’s
time. Just like how our understanding of diseases has grown so has our
understanding of ethics and this hinders many developments in science to a more
morally correct model.
Some
situations arise for researchers to make great use out of. Around the time of
WW1 Apollinaire found that his diabetic patients’ symptoms were alleviating
when they were starving (McCoy, 2009) . The cause of this
alleviation seems a bit counter intuitive, but nonetheless low calorie diets
appeared to be an effective treatment for the patients and it is still recommended
to lower calories and spread out eating times throughout the day. Sadly, many
people developed some pretty bad misconceptions on starving. This continued
into today where a lot of diets are starvation diets, which are definitely not
recommended by good clinicians. This seems to be a very common occurrence in transferring/translating
information though. More recently was gluten being bad for you, but in reality
it only hurts those with celiac disease. The first publication about low
rations and exercise was made by Elliot Joslin in 1916 validating Apollinaire’s
observations (McCoy, 2009) .
Things
drastically changed though for diabetics in 1921 as mentioned earlier with
Banting and colleagues’ discovery of insulin as a form of a treatment (ADA, 2014). In 1936 was the first alternative
insulin which functions at a different speed (ADA,
2014). By 1966 the first cure of sorts came about which was a pancreatic
transplant (ADA, 2014). 1970 though was
one of the first steps towards diabetics getting some direct control over their
condition. This was the invention of a glucose meter (ADA, 2014). Insulin pumps were invented in 1976 further developing
patient control over their disease (ADA, 2014).
What these do is maintain a constant blood glucose for the patient which is in
a healthy range limiting hazardous conditions for them. Insulin wasn’t high in
supply though making treatment hard to receive until 1982. At this point the
FDA approved human insulin production by bacteria for us to use on people (ADA, 2014). Treatments and access to them changed
the most in the 1900s comparatively to the previous 3000+ years
The names associated with diabetes
also changed quite a bit along with the treatments that came about. In 1979 the
different types were as follows: 1) insulin-dependent 2) noninsulin-dependent
3) Gestational Diabetes and 4) serving as an “other” category (ADA, 2014). This naming didn’t stick though.
Instead the names again changed in 1997 to type 1 and type 2 diabetes (ADA, 2014). This was essentially after their
different types of treatment instead of the etiology of the disease like
previously. With all this though where do we go from here and where is here?
Well as of 2012 10% of diabetic
patients are treatable with insulin (Polonsky, 2012) . That means 90% of
diabetics largely have a health problem as a result of life style choices such
as diet and exercise. What is happening to make this such a large trend? Well,
this is a multilayered issue, but many schools are starting to eliminate their
physical education programs and recess to increase standardized test scores (Reed, 2013) . This is counter to
what a lot of research says though about exercise providing large cognitive
benefits (Liu-Ambrose & Donaldson, 2012) . So not only schools
reducing the physical health of their children, but they are also diminishing
their mental health. There are also many food deserts in the nation which don’t
allow access to healthy varieties of food. There are, of course, ways to remedy
these issues and some will likely work better than others. Then there are life
style choices; all of these play a factor in diabetes.
Nutrition is a very large concern to
many populations. One thing which can jeopardize nutrition is a food desert. Food
deserts are a very large challenge and Ron Finley tackles these head on in his
community outreach. What’s being done by him and his volunteers is working in a
food desert in LA (TED, 2013) . What they are doing
in their work is providing fruits and vegetables in public areas where grass
had been. The city allows for it as long as maintenance is up kept and many of
the community members go out and do this themselves. This has a huge impact on
the communities’ nutrition in a very positive way. What else can be done
nutritionally? Well, Japan is taking another approach which is education in
public school systems (Nerman, 2014) . There is a ton of
misinformation out there as I stated with things like starvation diets. This
would be an amazing way to combat such things and provide children as well as
adults with critical thinking skills in regards to what they eat. There are
some other policies being proposed as well such as: tax sweetened beverages
more, encourage lower calorie diets, and develop stem cell treatment for type 1
diabetics (Polonsky, 2012) . The last one can
act as a cure without the need for a transplant of an entire pancreas which
would be great! We already encourage a low calorie diet a lot of the time, but
this doesn’t really deter us from getting an extra-large pizza instead of a
medium. Scaring people about potential diseases from making such choices and
then informing though is very effective with behavioral change (Aronson, Wilson, & Akert, 2013) . So our society
could do a better job at encouraging us to stop ruining our pancreas like they
do with our lungs via cigarettes. The last one which is increasing taxes on
sweetened beverages wouldn’t be very effective. Many people don’t account for
tax on an item, but rather their whole bill when grocery shopping. What would
make this more effective is if taxes were included in store prices like they
are in New Zealand. Things aren’t doom and gloom though and there is still hope
for a positive change for the future. As Polonsky puts it “the challenges are
still substantial, if we build on past accomplishments, there is every reason
for optimism that another breakthrough as dramatic as the discovery of insulin
will occur in the foreseeable future, with a similarly dramatic impact” (2012).
Works Cited
Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M.
(2013). Social Psychology. London: Pearson.
Association, A. D.
(2014, May 9). History of Diabetes. Retrieved from www.diabetes.org:
http://www.diabetes.org/research-and-practice/student-resources/history-of-diabetes.html?referrer=https://www.bing.com/
Liu-Ambrose, T.,
& Donaldson, M. G. (2012). Exercise and cognition in older adults: is
there a role for resistance training programmes? Br J Sports Med,
25-27.
McCoy, K. (2009, 11
3). The History of Diabetes. Retrieved from www.everydayhealth.com:
http://www.everydayhealth.com/diabetes/understanding/diabetes-mellitus-through-time.aspx
Nerman, D. (2014).
Food education the law in Japan. CBC News Health.
Polonsky, K. S.
(2012). The Past 200 Years in Diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine,
1332-1340.
Reed, K. (2013).
Physical Education Trend Must Be Reversed. The Huffington Post.
TED (Director).
(2013). Ron Finley: A guerilla gardener in South Central LA [Motion
Picture].
Like you mentioned earlier in your paper, many people overlook the history of diabetes; I am one of these people. I learned that the history of the disease is actually extremely interesting. I didn't realize that diabetes could be dated as far back as it is. It also makes me curious whether or not there was a recognizable difference between type 1 and type 2 diabetes back then. I also think its interesting that there was a recognition of the link between nutrition and diabetes early on. I read that most present cases of diabetes can be classified as type 2 diabetes. I wonder if we have any resources that could explain to us which type of diabetes people suffered from before the recognition of the different types. Maybe modern lifestyle changes caused the development of multiple types of diabetes when there was originally only one.
ReplyDeleteIt is really amazing how far back our records go! At the same time though I was hoping to find more detailed records to see if the disease has changed at all over time, but I didn't find anything. I wouldn't have imagined they would have seen a difference aside from the age of the individuals. I am curious about looking into how incidence of both types has changed as well.
DeleteI have always enjoyed history - there is a lot of knowledge and perspective that we can gain from it. It is scary to thing that 100 years ago diabetes could essentially be a death sentence. It was interesting how you mentioned how researchers in the past did not have as many barriers as far as ethics went. They could experiment on dogs without any major (or even minor) repercussions. Although ethics in research are very important, I sometimes wonder what we may be missing in research by not performing certain experiments. The information about the pancreatic transplant was interesting too. A risky path to a cure, but it does seem like a very plausible option. Hopefully a good cure can be found in the next few decades.
ReplyDeleteIt really was and if you look at pictures of the patients it isn't pretty. They did experiment on dogs quite a bit. Harlow's monkey experiment happened in the 50s and was published in 58. This shows that we were still able to get away with quite a bit back then even. I do wonder what we are missing though as well as a result of ethical restrictions, but I am also happy for their presence. Plausible, risky, and low output solution. The issue is that there are just too many people with diabetes now.
Delete