Using
the Tools
E.J. Leavitt
As my time began here at Southern Utah
University, I believe that I had a basic grasp of the life sciences – mostly
thanks to the great science teachers that taught me in middle and high school.
For instance, I knew relatively well what organelles were in a cell, and that a
single leaf carries an array of pigments that are each responsible for the
changing colors that we see during the autumn season. Although these series of
facts were useful to me, however, they were more like the tools that a growing
child might see in the family garage – potentially useful, but without first
acquiring the confidence and skill necessary to operate them, the child would
likely either misuse those tools, or not use them at all. Similar to that child
and the tools, I was aware of many facts and concepts, but the need to learn how
to apply knowledge remained.
Curiosity
is not a characteristic that I have lacked. Long before studying at SUU, I
enjoyed learning how things work. Particularly interesting to me are the many
ways that living organisms operate. The structure and physiology of the living
things around us are incredibly complex, and I wished to know more about how
they work. My interests coming to college settled mostly on pursuing a career
in medicine, and the pursuit of which has given me more than enough
opportunities to satiate my curiosity. Majoring in Biology and studying the
life sciences has been a wonderful way to train me to use the metaphorical
tools in the garage.
One of the
most valuable insights and skills that I have learned at SUU are the
methodology and communication routes used by the scientific community. Before
college, I had learned about the scientific method (i.e. observing, asking a
question, forming a hypothesis, making predictions, testing the hypothesis,
etc.) was not very familiar with scientific journals. Originally, I had it in
my mind that scientific discoveries mostly originated from an ingenious
scientist slugging it out in a laboratory for months or years in the attempt to
find a breakthrough. However, I was ignorant of the massive utility of
collaborative work. There are scores of peer-reviewed journals and a seemingly
endless supply of research articles that form the foundation of knowledge upon
which scientists can chase after new findings. Although some articles have
faults that have slipped through the peer-review process, scientists can
critically analyze articles and results related to their research to explore
and build upon the work of others.
On that
note, studying at SUU has helped me to gain an important awareness of the
importance of critical thinking. There are many others like myself who enjoy
learning about science-related factoids. However, also similar to myself before
college, these people often fail to watch, read, and learn facts, opinions, and
events with a grain of salt. Claims are often made on TV, the internet, and
other places that fail to provide any legitimate sources (which relates to a
new pet peeve of mine: the proliferation of fake news and conspiracy theories
on social media feeds).
When false claims are not analyzed
critically, tragedies and otherwise negative consequences may occur. For
example, Andrew Wakefield’s retracted 1998 study that linked vaccines and
autism had been accepted by many groups of parents and other individuals. This
led to increases in the unvaccinated population (due in part to “anti-vaxxers”)
and of otherwise preventable measles outbreaks, which have cost lives and
millions of dollars in health care and research costs (AOL 2011). If
Wakefield’s results and methodology were more closely examined by the public,
many of the aforementioned consequences could have been avoided. Thus, my
biggest insight on how scientists work and think about the world is the dire
need to think and work critically.
Next year,
I will begin my studies in medical school. Over the next several years, I will
learn many new concepts and practice a plethora of medical techniques – many of
them involving high stakes if performed incorrectly. Science will play a part
in my world in that I will need to read and learn from other professionals
regarding what works and what does not. While reading medical journals and
discussing procedures and medications with my colleagues, I will need to
utilize critical thinking, applying my knowledge of biochemistry, anatomy,
physiology, and other applicable topics to sort out good solutions from the bad
ones. Although I may not be actively involved in research during my career, it
will be essential to keep up with research and results regarding procedures and
medications that I may or may not prescribe for my patients. The skills that I
have acquired here at SUU – the capacity to apply knowledge and think
critically – will be crucial for the success of my career, the safety of my
future patients, and for the benefit of the communities around me.
AOL
Editors. 2011. The autism vaccine fraud: Dr. Wakefield’s costly lie to society.
AOL. Retrieved October 28, 2016 from
http://www.aol.com/article/2011/01/12/autism-vaccine-fraud-wakefield-cost-money-deaths/19793484/?gen=1
E.J., I feel like I can relate to every point that you make in your essay. I also envisioned breakthroughs as a result of an Einstein-like individual who slaved away for years until finally something clicked. I never realized that breakthroughs come from individuals just like you or me, with help from scientists in the past. I love how you relate our knowledge as incoming students with tools in a garage, nice to look at, but not necessarily useful. Great article and good writing!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your essay. I think that research and critically thinking is an attribute that is essentially getting lost in much of this generation, due to the immediate access of technology and "answers". I really think that SUU has taught me many of those same principles in really applying myself and thinking about the outcomes to my actions and figuring out ways to avoid negative consequences. Thanks EJ for sharing!
ReplyDelete