The concept and practice of Ayurveda is extremely interesting especially compared to the practice of western or modern medicine. Ayurveda takes an entirely different approach than western medicine as it focuses on health holistically through a balance of mind, body, and spirit. Modern Medicine is not as concerned about promoting overall health, but rather addressing a problem once it has already manifested itself. Modern medicine offers a large variety of medications to improve symptoms and prevent further issues whereas Ayurveda has increased focus on diet and lifestyle to prevent disease. Both methods of addressing health are vital in the prevention and treatment of disease, but I believe there is a disconnect between them in our healthcare system.
I think one of the reasons that Ayurveda has not gained as much popularity in western healthcare is because of the high-pressure, instant gratification lifestyle that has been adopted. Most people would agree that disease prevention is a much better method of curing disease, but environmental factors outweigh the more long-term cure. For example, western cultures pursuit of instant gratification in the form of overeating, lack of exercise, substance abuse, and lack of sleep, override a healthy lifestyle. A variety of diseases in the heart, kidney, liver, and brain have resulted which require western medicine to find a cure. In the article “Why traditional Chinese and Indian ayurvedic medicine can’t compete with Western drugs” this same concept is discussed and other factors contributing to the disconnect. It also talks about how western medicine is a “profit-driven health care industry.” In the end, it comes down to money. Ayurvedic medicine doesn’t have the demand for, “expensive equipment, pills or lucrative research grants.” Traditional medicine practitioners are poorly paid because their treatment is inexpensive and doesn’t require costly, extensive research to find a cure. How can any money be made when the doctor prescribes that you stop smoking and cut back on sugar? With no medicine prescribed, there is very little money to be made. So, in reality, the lack of an Ayurvedic approach to health care is a vicious cycle that will be hard to break. I think the most important thing to remember is that both approaches to healthcare are extremely important and both offer incredible insight into preventing, treating, and curing disease. In combination, they have the power to improve medical care through a holistic, evidence-based medical system.
Ayurvedic medicine has many applications to common diseases that are prevalent today. One of these diseases is diabetes. There are an estimated 87 million Americans with prediabetes, out of those 30-50% will go on to develop Type II diabetes. 80% of those people will have non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The issue not only lies with getting type II diabetes but also developing insulin resistance. According to the article, “Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome in the United States,” published in 2015, one in three Americans have insulin resistance. Insulin resistance is triggered by a variety of factors including weight, age, genetics, sedentary lifestyle, and smoking. Insulin resistance not only leads to type II diabetes, but also cardiovascular disease, stroke, and cancer. The good news is that many of these diseases can be avoided through lifestyle changes.
The reason ayurvedic medicine is highly applicable to diabetes is because diabetes is a classic example of an imbalance in the body. Since the body cannot assimilate glucose into the cells, it tries to compensate through other pathways which cause many downstream problems. This results in an imbalance in the body’s main autonomic mechanisms. Common factors that increase the chances of diabetes include high triglycerides, low HDLs, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, and high fasting blood sugar. All of these factors are linked to diet and exercise. I was interested in learning about how obesity specifically contributes to diabetes on a cellular level. I researched this question and found the article, “What causes Insulin Resistance Underlying Obesity.” The article highlighted the most recent findings correlating obesity with insulin resistance. The main conclusions were that visceral obesity is the main driver for insulin resistance. It is related to insulin resistance as excess lipids accumulate in the liver. This is due to excess fatty acids from visceral adipose tissue which drain into the portal vein. The lipid accumulation results in impaired insulin signaling through cell autonomic mechanisms and through the creation of inflammation which produces inflammatory cytokines. Subsequently, insulin action is impaired. The article then describes how future therapies could prevent the buildup of visceral fat by directing the fat to the subcutaneous fat storage. This could be done through the control of the extracellular matrix and capillary expansion. Although, in reality, the best therapy to prevent visceral fat is simply diet and exercise. This article is another example of how western medicine is focused on curative care.
Besides the many physical costs of diabetes, there are also many economic costs and social costs. In the article, “Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2012” the large burden of diabetes costs is studied in depth. The article estimated that diabetes cost the U.S. economy 245 billion dollars in 2012 with 22.3 million people diagnosed with diabetes. This number is substantially higher compared to the number of people in 2007 with diabetes (17.5 million). The article attributes this large increase in diabetes to changing demographics including an increase in the risk factors for diabetes including obesity, decreasing mortality, and improvements in detecting diabetes. Since this article is seven years old, I thought I would see what the numbers for diabetes are now. I was blown away to find out that in 2018 there were 34.2 million people with diabetes according to the CDC. According to the Diabetes Research Foundation, diabetes cost the U.S. 327 billion dollars in 2017. Also, diabetes was the seventh leading cause of death in the United States in 2017 with 83,564 deaths attributed directly to diabetes and 270,702 deaths which were related to diabetes. I thought these numbers would be interesting to compare to the Covid-19 deaths in the U.S. There have been 218,648 deaths from the Coronavirus. So obviously diabetes is still a major problem which not only kills many people but also costs the economy billions of dollars. “Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2012,” also noted that the 245 billion dollars was not accounting for those who had undiagnosed diabetes or those with prediabetes. Also, the costs of diabetes are ultimately passed along to society through higher insurance premiums and taxes, reduced earnings, and reducing the standard of living. Finally, the CDC estimated that diagnosed diabetes will double between 2010 and 2050. Not only does diabetes cost the health care system billions, but it also costs thousands of lives.
Along with all of the physical and economic costs of diabetes, there are also social consequences. Individuals with diabetes can have more aggression and stress, depression, anxiety, and also increased issues when drinking alcohol. With all of the numbers of costs and deaths of diabetes, I think it’s interesting that both Type I and Type II can be managed by diet and exercise as well as medication. But still, thousands of people are diagnosed with Type II diabetes every year (1.4 million every year) when diet and exercise can prevent it.
References
Hong, N. W. (2018, July 20). Why TCM and Indian medicine can't compete with Western drugs. Retrieved October 10, 2020, from https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/health-beauty/article/2107357/why-traditional-chinese-and-indian-ayurvedic-medicine-cant
Targeting Insulin Resistance: The Ongoing Paradigm Shift in Diabetes Prevention. American Journal of Managed Care. April 11, 2013. http://www.ajmc.com/journals/evidence-based-diabetes-management/2013/2013-1-vol19-sp2/targeting-insulin-resistance-the-ongoing-paradigm-shift-in-diabetes-prevention
https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0b013e3283514e13
American Diabetes Association. Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. (2013). DiabetesCare, 36(4), 1033-1046. doi:10.2337/dc12-2625
National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2020. (2020, August 28). Retrieved October 10, 2020, from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/date/statistics-report/index.html
United States. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2020, from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
U.S. Department of Health and Human Service. Press Release. (2010, October 22). Retrieved October 10, 2020, from https://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/2010/r101022.html
National Institute of Mental Health. Chronic Illness & Mental Health. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2020, from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/chronic-illness-mental-health/index.shtml
Diabetes, Alcohol, and Social Drinking. (2017, November 9). Retrieved from https://www.healthline.com/health/type-2-diabetes/facts-diabetes-alcohol
I really agree with your take on the instant gratification culture that modern societies have fostered for the last few decades. There's certainly a correlation there and it'd be interesting to look for current research regarding the topic. Ayurveda promotes healthy practices that are very popular today such as meditation, diet or yoga. So I believe globalization has allowed more access to this practices and many individuals are deciding to practice prevention. However, the diabetic pandemic and other chronic diseases are on the rise, and this shows a general trend that is not that optimistic.
ReplyDeleteI like that your first paragraph explained the different approaches and interconnections between western medicine and ayurveda more concisely than anything I read online haha. You did strong work explaining the concepts and your thoughts in a way that was interesting and also really easy to understand and follow. I appreciated the way you discussed the disconnect between western medicine and ayurveda as something to be bridged, rather than competing ideologies. And everything to do with diabetes was laid out so excellently. I have no gripes with your paper. I feel like your phrasing, "In ______ article, "(article title)" they discussed (what the title says)." felt sort of repetitive, but I also think stating the title of an article as a way to cite it is something we as readers just don't see as much so it just feels different.
ReplyDeleteI like how you brought up the money-making aspect of western medicine. It almost seems as if doctors could prescribe Ayurvedic approaches that would work but people want some form of medication to make them feel as if something is being done about their health concern without changing their lifestyle or finding balance. I also appreciated the comparing statistics for deaths by coronavirus versus deaths by diabetes.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your paper. I agreed with the points you made and thought that you led into them well. I also wrote about how a big issue with western medicine is that it is simply curing the symptoms and undermining the underlying issue. With ayurvedic techniques, we can begin to treat the root of the issue and hopefully prevent people from developing further diseases. I also liked how you mentioned how western medicine revolves around money. I think that is an important issue to understand, but I also think Ayurveda is not commonly accepted due to our society. People are creatures of habit and they will continue to do what they have done for life even if it is detrimental to their health, for example life long smokers. It is also a lot more work to change your lifestyle completely than it is to just take a pill every morning. Overall, I really liked your paper and thought that all the points you made were relevant and things that we should look into more regarding this topic.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete*Reposted because it wouldn’t let me edit a typo*
ReplyDeleteWhile I agree it is important to apply Ayurvedic philosophy to medicine, I disagree with a few points. I mainly object to the idea that mainstream medicine is not preventative or holistic, and the idea that alternative medicine makes no money.
I have read many papers and met many doctors focused on preventative health measures and balancing mental and physical health. Many experts have already been preaching the importance of healthy, balanced lifestyles and taking care of mental health. Maybe some professionals are only focused on narrow aspects of physical symptoms only, but that has not been my experience. In this, Ayurveda and mainstream medicine already share much common ground.
My other point is that Ayurveda is a as much a money making industry just as mainstream medicine. We learn from one of the articles linked in the class drive that alternative medicine is a multi-billion dollar industry. Ayurvedic practitioners are not only advising people to stop smoking and cut out sugar, (which mainstream doctors also commonly prescribe) but also sell their own medicine, supplements, and advisory services.
I don’t think Ayurveda is inferior to modern medicine, rather it’s a different field of knowledge. The biggest differences between Ayurveda and modern medicine is that modern medicine is more evidence based, where Ayurveda is more philosophical. Both have their place, and the Ayurvedic philosophy of balancing body and mind should definitely be part of mainstream medicine. And as I mentioned earlier, I believe we’ve already made great strides in that regard.